Neglected by the scientific world

As disturbing as it may seem, the scientific world does not question many human behaviors, at least not by referring them to possible mental dysfunction.

Most researchers start from the point of view that the human being is what he is, that his defects are constitutional, inherent in the imperfections of nature, the limits of de-la-genetique, and in any case inevitable. Anthropologists, for example, most often oppose rather violently (under the guise of cultural relativism) the idea that one culture may be better than another, which prevents us from immediately asking questions about the system of values inherent in our present culture.

Psychoanalysis demonstrates that there is endemic neurosis, but does not call into question the societal data responsible for it. It barely addresses the problem of ego and the origins of selfishness, intrinsically linked to leitmotiv growth and consumerism.

These issues, however, are most important in terms of human condition and the environment, and would overly undermine our form of civilization. The scientific world, if it wants to be recognised and financed, is obliged to conceal or minimize the issues that disturb: especially those concerning the possible psychic dysfunctions that have generated the harmful value system of which we are held.

To admit that human psychism could work differently is to question oneself, and at the same time attack all those on whom personal interests depend. This requires a form of objectivity and modesty that is not encountered every day, even in the best universities and laboratories.

Human ecogenetics takes the risk of stifling many beliefs, prejudices and stereotypes, even if it bothers, as the urgency of the situation simply does not allow for any more procrastination. Too much time has already been lost.